Hi folks
Have just received this and I am not surprised.
It must be stated however that my own case is being looked into and I have assurances that my concerns and complaints are being listened to by the Stoke on Trent Partnership who are acting in a professional manner.
It must be stressed that I have no full knowledge to the individual case below,however an injunction request is of no surprise.
However I am so appalled at this that I need to share.
This is not acceptable and I am sickened that the farther had to go to this length.
Sir James rejected a sweeping injunction designed to effectively prevent anyone in the world from seeing the film, knowing the names of the social workers involved, or even discovering the name of the local authority that applied for the order, Staffordshire County Council.
Have just received this and I am not surprised.
It must be stated however that my own case is being looked into and I have assurances that my concerns and complaints are being listened to by the Stoke on Trent Partnership who are acting in a professional manner.
It must be stressed that I have no full knowledge to the individual case below,however an injunction request is of no surprise.
However I am so appalled at this that I need to share.
This is not acceptable and I am sickened that the farther had to go to this length.
Sir James rejected a sweeping injunction designed to effectively prevent anyone in the world from seeing the film, knowing the names of the social workers involved, or even discovering the name of the local authority that applied for the order, Staffordshire County Council.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We are here to try to make change please dont send posts which are without viable proof there are some good people out there attempting to do a good job.