Hi Bloggers
The meeting yesterday went well with the solar company and have learned a lot but more on that when I have worked out all the figures.
I have received today A reply from the HCPC stating that a social worker who told the Department for Work and Pensions falsely that I was a thief and acted prior to the outcome of a VA is fit to practice.
In the words a social worker once stated to me "I Dont Think So"
My complaint against the county council and the trust is still being dragged out despite trying the actions listed
Action
Make polite written complaint about the failure to carry out A proper and efficient investigation.
Outcome
No good biased 1 sided investigation in favor of LA.
Action
Post consistently on the internet and state facts regarding conduct and actions of the LA and the Trust.
Outcome
Get meeting with the Trust who will look into the matter and come back to me in January with results and findings.
It is now nearly the end of march and there is little in sight of an end.
The communication from the LA is little to none existent and I hold the view that the trust have very little power to effect any change in there partnership between themselves and the LA.
I raised the conduct with the Local Government Ombudsman who found that the LA had followed all procedure and practice and a through investigation in line with the complaint regulations had been carried out.
There decision has been quashed as apparently they had ignored all the evidence that I had provided and listened to the biased view of the LA.
Upon the LGO being advised of my full intent to pursue there decision with a Judicial Review a new investigation has been started and there previous decision quashed.
I hold no concern that a few of the social workers involved in my grandfathers care are not fit to practice, we do not require those who can not tell the truth or who fail to carry out the duty of care expected.
These individuals are still in work and have not been held to account by there employers and the HCPC persistently upholds the practices of the individuals concerned despite physical evidence
The only way forward sadly is the publication of evidence and the naming of those concerned.
I have placed a limit of the next 14 days and then I have to become something I dislike, This will allow me to publish everything and walk away leaving the evidence for those in the future as reference.
Any individual who feels that my comments could be libel please feel free to challenge.
These people will never understand Accountability Transparency Honesty or Change.
We the little people must do as we are told and just go quietly away
Steve
The meeting yesterday went well with the solar company and have learned a lot but more on that when I have worked out all the figures.
I have received today A reply from the HCPC stating that a social worker who told the Department for Work and Pensions falsely that I was a thief and acted prior to the outcome of a VA is fit to practice.
In the words a social worker once stated to me "I Dont Think So"
My complaint against the county council and the trust is still being dragged out despite trying the actions listed
Action
Make polite written complaint about the failure to carry out A proper and efficient investigation.
Outcome
No good biased 1 sided investigation in favor of LA.
Action
Post consistently on the internet and state facts regarding conduct and actions of the LA and the Trust.
Outcome
Get meeting with the Trust who will look into the matter and come back to me in January with results and findings.
It is now nearly the end of march and there is little in sight of an end.
The communication from the LA is little to none existent and I hold the view that the trust have very little power to effect any change in there partnership between themselves and the LA.
I raised the conduct with the Local Government Ombudsman who found that the LA had followed all procedure and practice and a through investigation in line with the complaint regulations had been carried out.
There decision has been quashed as apparently they had ignored all the evidence that I had provided and listened to the biased view of the LA.
Upon the LGO being advised of my full intent to pursue there decision with a Judicial Review a new investigation has been started and there previous decision quashed.
I hold no concern that a few of the social workers involved in my grandfathers care are not fit to practice, we do not require those who can not tell the truth or who fail to carry out the duty of care expected.
These individuals are still in work and have not been held to account by there employers and the HCPC persistently upholds the practices of the individuals concerned despite physical evidence
The only way forward sadly is the publication of evidence and the naming of those concerned.
I have placed a limit of the next 14 days and then I have to become something I dislike, This will allow me to publish everything and walk away leaving the evidence for those in the future as reference.
Any individual who feels that my comments could be libel please feel free to challenge.
These people will never understand Accountability Transparency Honesty or Change.
We the little people must do as we are told and just go quietly away
Steve
No comments:
Post a Comment
We are here to try to make change please dont send posts which are without viable proof there are some good people out there attempting to do a good job.